Market Value Approach for Company Valuation

Determine the market value of your company easily and straightforwardly by

  • finding companies comparable in industry and size and looking at their sale prices
  • using comparative figures such as the revenue-profit ratio
  • applying these figures to your own company to determine the market value.

This approach is popular because of its directness and the use of market data, and is often used in company sales, financial reporting and legal valuation issues. The selection of relevant comparable companies and the interpretation of market data are crucial for the accuracy of the valuation.

Two different approaches to the market value approach

The Comparable Companies Analysis (CCA) is an approach that relies on valuation by comparison with listed companies. Financial ratios and industry multiples such as the price-earnings ratio or the enterprise value in relation to EBITDA are used to derive the value of a company. The challenge lies in selecting truly comparable companies and correctly adjusting their key figures to compensate for differences in business models, growth rates and market positioning.

The Comparable Transactions Analysis (CTA) analyzes recent sales of similar companies to determine a realistic market value. This method reflects what buyers are willing to pay under current market conditions and takes into account premiums for control options or synergies. The difficulty with the CTA lies in the availability and comparability of transaction data, as not all sales details are publicly available and transactions often have industry-specific characteristics.

Valuation Multiples in the Market Value Method

Valuation multiples are a central element of the Market Approach and play a crucial role in company valuation. They enable the comparison of companies based on standardized value measures.

EBITDA Multiple

  • Explanation: Measures the value of a company in relation to its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.
  • Advantages: Provides information about the operative performance without the influence of the capital structure.
  • Disadvantages: Can be distorted in capital-intensive business models that require high investments.
  • Frequency of use: Frequent, especially in industries where depreciation and amortization have a significant impact on the financial result.

EBIT Multiple

  • Explanation: Represents the company value in relation to the operative profit before interest and taxes.
  • Advantages: Focuses on operative profitability and is useful to compare companies with different depreciation policies.
  • Disadvantages: Not suitable for companies with high debt, as interest expenses are not considered.
  • Frequency of use: Often used, especially if the depreciation strategies of the companies are not comparable.

SDE Multiple

  • Explanation: Stands for Seller’s Discretionary Earnings and measures the value of a company in relation to the income that is available to the owner.
  • Advantages: Considers income that directly benefits the owner and is therefore relevant for personally managed SMEs.
  • Disadvantages: Can be subjective and depends on the expense structure of the owner.
  • Frequency of use: Very common for smaller and owner-managed companies, where the personal decisions of the owner influence the profit.

P/E Multiple (Price-Earnings Ratio)

  • Explanation: Measures the stock price of a company in relation to its earnings per share.
  • Advantages: Simple and intuitive, reflects the profit expectations of the market.
  • Disadvantages: Less meaningful for companies that do not generate profits or whose profits fluctuate greatly.
  • Frequency of use: Widely used for listed companies and also applicable for SMEs with stable profits.

Sales Multiple

  • Explanation: Compares the company value with the revenue and is often used for the valuation of companies that do not yet generate profits.
  • Advantages: Useful for the valuation of growth companies that are not yet profitable.
  • Disadvantages: Does not consider the cost structure and profitability of the company.
  • Frequency of use: Especially common in young, fast-growing industries or for start-ups.

Book Value Multiple

  • Explanation: Relates the company value to the book value of the equity.
  • Advantages: Based on objective, balance sheet values, simple calculation.
  • Disadvantages: Does not always reflect the actual market value or the future earnings potential.
  • Frequency of use: Is mainly used in asset-intensive industries or for the valuation for liquidation purposes.

In practice, the preferred multiples vary depending on the industry, market situation and company life cycle. For SMEs, the availability of comparison data must also be considered. The selection of the right multiple is crucial to achieve a realistic and market-driven valuation.

Market data and the valuation of SMEs

For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that are rarely listed on stock exchanges, market data poses a particular challenge. The Comparable Companies Analysis (CCA) requires a careful selection of similar companies, which is often limited by different operating sizes and market conditions. The Comparable Transactions Analysis (CTA) can be more relevant, as it considers actual sales cases that could reflect SME-specific market conditions. However, access to such data is often limited.

NIMBO is a leading platform for transaction multiples for SMEs in various countries. We publish monthly updated multiples for different countries, company sizes and industries.

Comparable Companies Analysis (CCA)

Step-by-step Procedure:

  1. Selection of comparable companies: Identify a group of companies that have similar business models, a comparable size and similar markets to the SME being valued.
  2. Data collection: Collect financial data of these companies, including revenue, EBITDA and net income.
  3. Calculation of the multiples: Determine valuation multipliers such as P/E ratio, EV/EBITDA or EV/revenue for each comparable company.
  4. Implementation of adjustments: Adjust the multiples to consider differences in growth, risk and capital structure (see chapter below).
  5. Application of the multiples: Apply the adjusted multiples to the corresponding financial key figures of the SME to be valued.

Example Calculation

This calculation values an SME based on comparable companies and using a multiplier (EV/EBITDA).

Details of the SME:

  • EBITDA: €2 million
  • Comparable companies – EV/EBITDA multiplier: 5
  • Adjusted multiplier (after growth adjustment): 6

Calculation of the Company Value

Company value = EBITDA x multiplier = €2 million x 6 = €12 million

The calculation results in a company value of €12 million by applying the adjusted multiplier:

Comparable Transactions Analysis (CTA)

  1. Selection of relevant transactions: Find (on the internet) recently completed sales transactions of companies that are similar to the SME being valued.
  2. Analysis of the transaction details: Examine the conditions of each transaction to understand relevant details such as purchase price and financial key figures.
  3. Calculation of the transaction multiples: Determine the multipliers from these transactions, such as purchase price to revenue or purchase price to EBITDA.
  4. Adjustment for special features: Take into account specific factors of the transactions that do not apply to the SME being valued.
  5. Application to the SME: Use the adjusted transaction multiples to estimate the value of the SME.

Example Calculation

This calculation values an SME based on recently completed transactions and using a multiplier (EV/EBITDA).

Details of the SME:

  • EBITDA: €5 million
  • Comparable companies – EV/EBITDA multiplier: 1.2
  • Adjusted multiplier (after growth adjustment): 1.3

Calculation of the Company Value

Company value = EBITDA x multiplier = €5 million x 1.3 = €6.5 million

The calculation results in a company value of €6.5 million by applying the adjusted multiplier:

NIMBO offers an online business valuation calculator, which is based on the CTA method and takes current market data and special features into account.

Enterprise Value vs. Equity Value within the Market Value Method

When valuing a company using the Market Approach, the distinction between Enterprise Value (EV) and Equity Value is of central importance. Both concepts reflect different aspects of the company value and play an important role in the interpretation of valuation multiples.

Enterprise Value (EV)

The EV measures the total value of the company, including debt and less liquid funds. It represents the value of all claims to the company – both equity and debt capital providers. In the context of the Market Approach, the EV is often used in connection with EBITDA or EBIT multiples to evaluate the operative earning power independently of the financing structure.

Advantages: Offers a holistic valuation, as it includes all capital sources.

Disadvantages: Can be more complicated in the calculation, especially if non-operating assets or liabilities must be considered.

Equity Value

The equity value is the value that is due to the owners of the company, i.e. the shareholders. It is calculated by subtracting the net financial debt (debt less liquid funds) from the EV. When using multiples such as the price-earnings ratio (P/E) or the book value multiple, the calculated value refers to the equity value.

Advantages: Directly relevant for shareholders, as it represents the value of their shares.

Disadvantages: Can be misleading for companies with high debt or significant liquid funds.

When applying the Market Approach to SMEs, it is essential to understand whether the calculated value refers to the EV or the equity value in order to draw the correct conclusions. This is particularly relevant when it comes to purchase price negotiations or financing decisions, in which the claims of different stakeholders must be considered. The correct application and interpretation of these values enables evaluators to deliver accurate and relevant valuations for SMEs.

Example of the Application of EBITDA Multiple to Enterprise Value and Equity Value

In order to calculate both the Enterprise Value (EV) and the equity value for an SME that is valued on the basis of an EBITDA multiple, we need additional information about the company’s capital structure, in particular the amount of liabilities and liquid funds. Here is an exemplary scenario:

Example Enterprise Value and Equity Value

Gegebene Daten:

  • EBITDA: 3 Millionen €
  • EBITDA Multiple: 5
  • Gesamtverbindlichkeiten: 2 Millionen €
  • Liquide Mittel: 500.000 €

Berechnung des Enterprise Values

EV = EBITDA x EBITDA-Multiple = 3 Millionen € x 5 = 15 Millionen €

Die Berechnung ergibt einen Enterprise Value von 15 Millionen €.

Berechnung des Equity Values

Equity Value= Enterprise Value – Netto-Finanzschulden= 15 Millionen € – 1.5 Millionen € = 13.5 Millionen €

Netto-Finanzschulden = Gesamtverbindlichkeiten – liquide Mittel = 2 Millionen € – 0.5 Millionen € = 1.5 Millionen €

Die Berechnung ergibt einen Equity Value von 13.5 Millionen €.

In this example, the enterprise value of the company would be 15 million, while the equity value, i.e. the value due to the owners, would be 13.5 million. The difference represents the net financial debt of the company.

Example of the Application of Price/Earnings (P/E) Multiple to the Equity Value

Gegebene Daten:

  • Nettogewinn nach Steuern: 1 Million €
  • P/E Multiple für vergleichbare Unternehmen : 8

Berechnung des Equity Values

Equity Value = Nettogewinn x P/E-Multiple = 1 Million x 8 = 8 Millionen €

Der Equity Value von 8 Millionen zeigt den Wert an, der direkt den Eigentümern des Unternehmens zuzurechnen ist. Dies würde den Wert ihrer Anteile repräsentieren, wenn das Unternehmen verkauft wird. P/E-Multiples sind gängig für börsennotierte Unternehmen

Adjustments and Valuation Corrections in the Market Value Method

When applying the market value method to SMEs, adjustments are often necessary to consider the special features of the individual company and to determine an accurate value. Here are the key elements of the adjustments:

  • Size adjustments: SMEs can have different risk profiles and growth prospects compared to larger companies. Adjustments to size premiums or discounts are necessary to consider these differences.
  • Market-specific adjustments: Local and regional markets can differ significantly from the conditions under which comparable companies were valued. Adjustments for geographic and market-specific factors are therefore often required.
  • Non-operating assets: SMEs sometimes hold assets that do not directly contribute to the earning power of the company. The value of these assets must be determined separately and deducted from or added to the operative business value.
  • Non-recurring items: One-time income or expenses that are non-recurring must be identified and factored out of the valuation to obtain an accurate picture of the sustainable earnings situation.
  • Synergy and control premiums: When valuing in the context of acquisitions, potential synergies or the premiums for the takeover of control must be considered, which can increase the value beyond the pure market value.
  • Warehouse: Read our blog post on the treatment of the warehouse.

The mentioned adjustments are crucial to consider the special features of SMEs in the valuation and to ensure that the determined value is as accurate as possible. The ability to make knowledgeable adjustments is a key aspect of the valuation competence in the context of the market value method.

Advantages and Limitations of the Market Value Method

The Market Approach can be an effective valuation method for SMEs if it is used carefully and considering its limitations.

  • Market relevance: Reflects what buyers are willing to pay in reality, which enables a realistic company valuation.
  • Negotiation basis: Offers SME owners a strong basis for price negotiations based on current market data.
  • Transparency: Increases the transparency in the valuation, as it is based on real market data and not on subjective assessments.
  • Data availability: Often, publicly available data about sales of comparable private companies is missing.
  • Comparability: The uniqueness of many SMEs makes it difficult to find actually comparable companies.
  • Regional market conditions: Regional influences that can influence the value may not be captured in general market data.
  • Company specifics: Specific SME attributes such as customer relationships and market position are difficult to integrate into general market comparisons.

For an overview of the most important valuation methods for company valuation.